English History – Page 8 – General History

English History

Home/English History

The ‘good’ old days

The first half of the 19th century saw the population of Britain expand more rapidly than was healthy. Thanks to huge medical advances, more hygiene and better food, and because more children survived (out of the broods of a dozen or more), early Victorian families (1841 – 61) in the population of England, Scotland and Wales grew from 17 to 23 millions. Large families were the rule in upper, middle and lower classes. Queen Victoria herself was to have nine children. In the mining districts seventeen was considered normal.

'Play up and play the game!' / bbc.co.uk

‘Play up and play the game!’ / bbc.co.uk

 

Guests admitted to the sacred circle of the family home would find their hostess pregnant, attended by a flock of little boys and little girls coming for a peep. The father or paterfamilias was the absolute centre of regularity and order; whether or not he adored his children he was an awe-inspiring figure, whiskery, his judgements infallible, supposedly irreproachable in his moral conduct (though many contemporary writers thought not); his wife, who had probably been a mere wisp of a girl when he married her at seventeen or eighteen, had become (and had to become) a ‘housekeeper, nurse, governess, and sitting hen’. She would be broad, stiff in her corsets, and lacking in ideas (though contemporary writers would seem to give this last conceit the lie!). (more…)

By | 2013-06-11T07:21:10+00:00 June 11th, 2013|English History, Philosophy, World History|0 Comments

King George’s War & King William’s War

 

The assault on Cape Breton Island was successful / louisbourghistory.blogspot.com

The assault on Cape Breton Island was successful / louisbourghistory.blogspot.com

 The War of the Austrian Succession in Europe actually saw a component part in North America, the first time such a thing should happen. Up until 1744 Europeans fought each other in the New World regularly, but not many expected the taking of Louisberg on Cape Breton Island by a combined British Navy/New England force commanded by W. Pepperell in 1745. Thus it was that a British army was able to see for itself what American colonists were capable of. Pepperell’s report is favourable. (more…)

What really happened to William II (Rufus) in 1100?

  

Rufis falls dying, struck by an arrow that 'bounced off' a stag / daviddarling.info

Rufis falls dying, struck by an arrow that ‘bounced off’ a stag / daviddarling.info

  William the ‘Red-faced’ was the second son of William, Duke of Normandy and William I of England, a.k.a. the Conquerer (q.v.). He was bad-tempered, wily and unpopular, and certainly not a chip off the old block. His father had made himself King of England, turning out the Saxon dynasty and replacing their language with Norman French, which was used officially in local and national government almost up to the time of Geoffrey Chaucer. Latin was universally used in the Church. When the Conquerer died, Rufus succeeded but not without considerable opposition from the barons of England, led by his own uncle, Odo Bishop of Bayeux, who wanted the older brother Robert on the throne. The Bishop’s rebellion was crushed first in 1088, as was a second attempt in 1095. (more…)

Louis-Philippe, last King of France (see footnote)

 

  

Louis-Philippe, also called Égalité like his father Duke of Orleans / commons.wikimedia.org

Louis-Philippe, also called Égalité like his father Duke of Orleans / commons.wikimedia.org

  This not very fortunate man was born in 1773, some sixteen years before the beginnings of the French Revolution. He was a descendent of Louis XIII, and the eldest son of Philippe, Duke of Orléans. Though very young, he supported the Duke in his stance with the people and against the Monarchy and the Government, being a traditional Orléanist. Both he and his father renounced their titles and called themselves Philipe Égalité. (more…)

By | 2013-04-24T09:33:57+00:00 April 24th, 2013|English History, French History, World History|0 Comments

The ‘Glorious Revolution’ in England and Scotland

  

James II, painted by Sir Peter Lely / thebooksmuggler.com

James II, painted by Sir Peter Lely / thebooksmuggler.com

   In most of the recorded history of the British Isles there have only been three ‘civil wars’: the first, known as the ‘Wars of the Roses’ was not a civil war but a gangsterlike struggle between the highest and richest nobles in the land with one aim in mind – the throne of England. Ordinary people in the shires and towns were not involved unless they had been pressganged into battle by their overlords. (more…)

A law in urgent need of repeal: the Royal Marriages Act

The Houses of Parliament / gothereguide.com

The Houses of Parliament / gothereguide.com

 Yes I know that the majority of you don’t give a stuff about royalty anyway but quite a few nations prefer their Head of State to wear a crown; some fine republics abound, where the H of S is elected every so often, such as the United States, France and Germany, but there are plenty of Presidents on this planet who would make a fine old mess of managing a small shop, let alone a nation.

    Now in Great Britain a hard law exists which is not as oecumenical as the Church of England claims to be: this law prohibits the heir to the throne (alone among all British subjects) from marrying a Catholic. It does not matter if the heir has not thought of doing so. The fact is that the law is insulting to the British monarch’s innumerable Catholic subjects, as well as being an even greater insult to common sense. (more…)

Margaret Thatcher, the ‘Iron Lady’

  

R.I.P. / guardian.co.uk

R.I.P. / guardian.co.uk

  Margaret Hilda Thatcher was born in 1925 in Lincolnshire, the daughter of the owner of a small grocer’s shop. She was a scholarship girl, brainy and hard-working, who moved rapidly upwards, starting with Magdalen College, Oxford, where she achieved everything she wanted.

She became the leader of the British Conservative Party in 1975, in the teeth of serious opposition from fellow conservatives such as Geoffrey Howe and Michael Heseltine, who could hardly believe that any mere woman might have such targets. In 1979 she became Britain’s first woman Prime Minister, and went on to serve the longest in that office in the 20th century. (more…)

Shakespeare’s ‘Scottish Play’ and bad luck

Jon Finch loses his head in Polanski's film of Macbeth / alucine.es

Jon Finch loses his head in Polanski’s film of Macbeth / alucine.es

Macbeth is William Shakespeare’s shortest tragedy, written between 1603 and 1607. The play contains many of the Bard’s most famous and usually ill-quoted lines, such as “Bubble, bubble” instead of ‘Double, double, toil and trouble’; “and good men’s lives expire before the feathers in their cap”; “is this a dagger I see before me?”; “at least I’ll die with harness on my back!” and so on. (more…)

The hornet John Wilkes

The hornet himself at his desk / thetimes.co.uk

The hornet himself at his desk / thetimes.co.uk

It is difficult correctly to describe John Wilkes in an unprejudiced manner. Personally, he was a stranger to cleanliness, he was fearfully ugly, he had a scurrilous and filthy mind and a temper that went well with the latter. It was also said that he could charm the leg off a donkey. He holds an important place in history not just because he was the first of the muck-raking journalists to become a politician, but because of his guts and determination. Small, powerful and squat, he charged head down at the chief representatives of ‘The System’ or ‘The Establishment’ in the eighteenth century; he was quite without fear – though he could easily have been arrested and locked up. In another country he would have been executed, or at least quietly eliminated by a secret service.
Wilkes was a Londoner, born in 1727.

At the end of his life he was hailed as a champion of liberty in both Britain and the United States. He married an heiress, Mary Meade in May, 1747, thus assuring himself of a comfortable income and a certain status. He was an active member of the ‘Hellfire Club’, which met in the ruins of an abbey in Buckinghamshire to indulge in debauched practices while celebrating ‘the Black Mass’. By 1763 at the age of thirty-six, he owned his own pamphlet – The North Britain. The paper was politically speaking radical to say the least; in fact it was a ticking bomb waiting to go off. Wilkes used it to publish articles written by himself attacking the King’s ministers and by clear implication, George III himself. He got himself elected as Member of Parliament, thus achieving some semblance of immunity. As he had attacked the government and the monarch in No. 45, he was arrested for seditious libel, but he claimed the privileges of an MP, insisting militia’s act was illegal. Indeed it was, as Wilkes had spotted that his arrest was made under a General Warrant, which did not include his name. The House of Commons then decided that he would have to go and expelled him on a charge of obscenity. His Essay on Woman, a nasty spoof of Alexander Pope’s Essay on Man, was sufficiently horrible for the MPs to throw him out of the Commons, hoping he would vanish and not re-appear.

Wilkes ran away to live in France, but was soon back (in 1768) to stand in the general election. He insulted Lord Sandwich (one of his pet targets) who said Wilkes would eventually die of the pox or on the gallows, to which he swiftly replied “that depends, my Lord, whether I embrace your mistress or your principles!” He was thrust into jail to serve 22 months for his earlier offences. By then he was of course popular with the mob – even popular liberal free-thinkers and the slowly expanding middle classes. After serving time, he was duly elected, but the Speaker in the Commons refused to allow him to take his rightful seat! By now the name of John Wilkes was on everybody’s lips up and down the country, and in Europe and the States too.

He was elected four times as Member for Middlesex, but was only permitted to take his seat in 1774. And there he stayed, stinging those around him given every opportunity, supporting or proposing parliamentary reform movements, giving clear support to the cause of American independence and making himself loathed more and more by the Establishment; equally, he was a hero to the Press and the public. If he needed to stress a point, he could and did call out a large mob, relied upon to carry him shoulder high through the corrupt and smelly streets of London.

Perhaps even a hornet grows gentler with Time, withdrawing its near-lethal sting, because by 1789 Wilkes was supporting the action being taken to suppress ‘the Gordon Riots’ . . . and openly opposing the French Revolution. He died at the age of seventy in 1797, having been a scourge and an irritant to ‘the authorities’ for most of the eighteenth century.

Load More Posts
Please disable your ad blocker on this website. Ads allow us to continue writing content. Thank you very much and we apologize for any inconvenience.